The Bigger Picture Part 32

Let’s look at the conspirators

The Price of Power by Seymour Hersh is giving a clear picture of how powerful Kissinger was in the Nixon administration.
But a search on ‘Bush’ in this book gives only one hit – and that is even only as part of a list of names.

Family of Secrets by Russ Baker gives a detailed picture of how rotten the Bush family is, pardon my French.
A search on ‘Kissinger’ gives 31 hits. Only a few of them imply any connection of importance between Bush and Kissinger. One of the hits shows information, that Bush, in 1975, received a telegram from Kissinger informing him that President Ford was about to appoint him Director of the CIA.

Both of these books are amazing! But I can’t help to think, that they are missing the common denominator behind Bush and Kissinger.
I have found both of them on a Committee of 300 member list, which means they are both Cabal Rats.
So, of course, they cooperated to take down Nixon – seen from my perspective.

Quote Russ Baker
Most historical accounts judge Nixon responsible in some way for the Watergate burglary—or at least for an effort to cover it up. And many people believe Nixon got what he deserved. But like other epic events, Watergate turns out to be an entirely different story than the one we thought we knew.

Which is what I will try to show you. But first …

Catch up

Halperin and Ellsberg had left WH and were attacking the Administration from the outside. Nixon’s only remaining ally, Secretary of State Rogers, was under constant attack from Kissinger – and Nixon didn’t intervene.
Ellsberg leaked the Pentagon Papers. And the Press was not in favor of Nixon – to say the least.

The wiretapping spread like wildfire – which Haig, Dean, and the FBI controlled. NSC had become a staff of malevolence.

Nixon was isolated, probably stressed, and couldn’t see an end to the Vietnam war – while demonstrations against the war were growing in numbers.

Bush had funded and installed Operation 40 – now called the Plumber -  in the White House and they had broken into the MK-Ultra psychiatrist’s office, resulting in a criminal record.

Quote Roger Stone
it is also the Bush money apparatus that financed the actual Watergate break-in; the bills found on the Watergate burglars by police came from a Mexican bank where the Bush money had been laundered.

Let’s take a closer look at George H W Bush.

I highly doubt Bush had enough conscience to make this statement

Bush

I wrote in the last part, that Nixon felt an obligation to give something back to the Bush family. In January 1971, Nixon made Bush US Ambassador to the UN – in which position he stayed until January 1973 when he persuaded Nixon to make him Chair of the Republican National Committee – which he did, ‘with a nod’.
Bush stayed in that position until September 1974, i.e until a few weeks after Nixon resigned.

In 1985 Joseph McBride, a former Daily Variety writer, was doing research – and an FBI memorandum, dated November 29, 1963, from FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover caught his eye.

Quote Russ Baker
Under the subject heading “Assassination of President John F. Kennedy,” Hoover reported that, on the day after JFK’s murder, the bureau had provided two individuals with briefings. One was “Captain William Edwards of the Defense Intelligence Agency.” The other: “Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency.”

The memorandum was about Cubans wanting to assassinate Fidel Castro.
George Bush? CIA? In 1963? Cubans?
Well, we know that Bush was “given a chance” to train Cubans in Operation 40 …

The CIA tried to deny any connection with Bush in 1963, it “was another man named George Bush.” But it turned out that this “other man,” named George William Bush was so low-level that he wasn’t even allowed to talk on the telephone.
He testified this in a deposition when a non-profit group was seeking records about George H W Bush.

So Bush was a secret CIA agent in 1963 … But wait … there’s more.

In December 2006, Jerry Shinley - a JFK assassination researcher – came upon:

Quote Russ Baker
an internal CIA memo that mentioned George H. W. Bush. Dated November 29, 1975, it reported, in typically spare terms, the revelation that the man who was about to become the head of the CIA actually had prior ties to the agency. And the connection discussed here, unlike that unearthed by McBride, went back not to 1963, but to 1953—a full decade earlier.

So Bush was some kind of CIA operative since 1953!

You might recall from the last Part, that there is a connection between Califano and Bush.
And as mentioned in Part 30, there is a connection between Califano and Haig.

Quote Russ Baker
As secretary of the Army under LBJ, Califano had been responsible for looking after veterans of the Bay of Pigs invasion, along with two of his aides: Haig and Alexander Butterfield.

So let’s recap:

• Operation 40 was created by Bush in 1960 – and was involved in the Bay of Pigs.

• Several members of Operation 40 were present in Dallas when JFK was assassinated – as was Nixon.

• CIA ignored Nixon’s request to see the JFK and Bay of Pigs files.

• Operation 40 was renamed to The Plumbers in the Nixon White House – and had the same members.

• Several of the Plumbers were officially former CIA

• Bush was a secret CIA operative for decades

• Bush had connections to Califano – and Califano had been responsible for looking after ‘veterans’ of the Bay of Pigs invasion.

• Haig assisted Califano in this assignment.

• Haig was chosen by Kissinger to the Manhattan Round Table.

Quote Roger Stone
Butterfield also had ties to General Alexander Haig; both Haig and Butterfield worked for Joseph Califano, who was special assistant to Army Secretary Cyrus Vance. Ironically, it was Haig who wrote and coordinated many of the drafts for the plan for a coup in Cuba in the summer and fall of 1963.

How convenient, that a man who could calculate a plan for a coup was now in the White House.

As I wrote in Part 30: Kissinger got his marching orders from Fritz Kraemer. And Haig “was closely affiliated with a core of senior military officers who revered geopolitical and military strategist Fritz Kraemer”.

I know correlation is not causation. But all these correlations are not coincidences either, in my opinion. And as we shall see, there are many more.
To me, it looks like a conspiracy.

Kissinger and Haig were in charge of the psychological warfare against Nixon: Isolating him, confusing him, making him paranoid - never knowing who his enemies were.
Kissinger and Haig pushed him over a line when they ‘agreed’ upon spying on Halperin and Ellsberg. Haig then took control of the wiretaps in coordination with the FBI and John Dean. Without Nixon’s approval, they also spied on journalists. Which should come back to hunt Nixon.    

Kissinger and Bush were connected via Haig, via the Plumbers, via CIA operatives – and both of them were members of the Committee of 300.
They were two arms of a nefarious plan to make a coup d’Etat without firing a shot.

Bush was taking over when they were ready for the final battle. As we shall see, he was a major factor behind the prosecutors and the judge in the Watergate Commission. 

Let’s look at a few more players before looking at Watergate:

Charles Radford was a Navy Stenographer and clerical aide to Admiral Robinson, who was in charge of communications between the White House and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Admiral Moorer, chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff, assigned Radford to spy on Kissinger and make a copy of whatever he could get his hands on, and pass it on to Robinson.

Moorer, as it later turned out, should have been investigated. I’ll come back to him in the section about Woodward.

Radford was brought along on travels – first with Haig and later Kissinger. He copied documents from Kissinger’s briefcase on the trip.
When Admiral Robinson was succeeded by Admiral Robert O Welander. Radford continued to provide information.

When he had spied for more than a year he saw another man be promoted – which he had thought would be the reward for what he did. And he didn’t see the JCS (Joint Chiefs of Staff) act on any of the information he provided.

He then apparently turned to columnist Jack Anderson – an old friend – and he began to take some of the most significant documents home – “as self-protection” he told Hersh.

Anderson won the 1972 Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting for his investigation of secret U.S. policy decision-making between the United States and Pakistan during the Indo-Pakistan War of 1971.

Quote Hersh
Radford and his wife had dinner in a Chinese restaurant with Jack Anderson and his wife. A few days later, Anderson published the first of his columns on the Nixon “tilt” toward Pakistan that would earn him the 1972 Pulitzer Prize for national reporting.

After the first article Nixon was sure, that Kissinger was the leak. He finally became suspicious of Kissinger – and paradoxically Kissinger wasn’t the culprit, this time.
But he found himself denied access to Nixon.

When the Plumbers discovered that Radford was the spy, Nixon did nothing about it. He probably couldn’t admit to Kissinger that he was wrong in accusing him.

And the journalist, Anderson? Haig and Dean arranged to wiretap him as well – which turned out to be another strong card against Nixon – revealed by the Watergate Commission.

David Young: An aide of Kissinger who shifted to a position in Ehrlichman’s Domestic Council staff.

As said, the Plumbers discovered that Radford was leaking information to the press.
Was he the only one? I don’t think so.

Quote Coleman:
President Nixon was literally left in the dark. He didn't even know that David Young, a Kissinger pupil, was working in the basement of the White House, supervising "leaks."

Young became head of the Plumbers – together with …

Egil Krogh: who had begun his work for Nixon by helping with the inauguration. He then became an advisor in the District of Columbia. His next step was liaison to the FBI – and then he worked with the CIA.
Colson – advisor to the president – talks about Krogh in an interview with Baker:

Quote Russ Baker
Krogh was “carrying large amounts of money over to Southeast Asia to pay off some of the drug lords. That had to be Agency work.” […] “The CIA liaison to the White House, by the way, also dealt with Hunt [E Howard Hunt, Plumber, and former CIA operative] all through the Watergate period—one of the very suspicious and unexplored aspects of the CIA’s involvement.”

John Dean: joined the WH staff in 1970 – brought in by Egil Krogh. At first, Krogh gave him daily access as an ‘outsider’ for two months, then he recommended him for ‘personal recruitment’ – and then Krogh got him hired without a background check.

Quote Russ Baker
It is not clear how Krogh knew Dean or why he became so determined to bring Dean into the White House—or whether he was told to do so.

As we shall see, Dean became a major player in the Coup d’Etat.

Two Watergate Break-ins

The result of the Fielding break-in, in September 1971, was to ensure the generation of a crime report, establishing a record of the burglary. The break-in would not become public knowledge until John Dean dramatically revealed it two years later—and implicitly tied Nixon to it by citing the involvement of Egil Krogh, the man in charge of Nixon’s so-called Plumbers unit.

Are you aware, that there were two Watergate break-ins? I wasn’t.
In May 1972, the Plumbers broke into the Watergate building. They installed listening devices.
On whose orders? Who listened to the tapings? Who knew about this?
It was professionally done – and nobody knew about it until the second break-in.

Quote Russ Baker
ON JUNE 17, 1972, A GROUP OF BURGLARS, carrying electronic surveillance equipment, was arrested inside the Democratic National Committee offices at 2650 Virginia Avenue, NW, in Washington, D.C., the Watergate building complex. The men were quickly identified as having ties to the Nixon reelection campaign and to the White House.

So the same crew broke in to remove the listening devices. But this time they taped the keyhole horizontally – which caught the eye of a guard. Why tape it at all? They were already in the office.
This is the same group of men who had operated professionally previously. It sure looks like it was meant to be discovered.
In his memoirs, Nixon wrote about his first reaction when reading the newspaper.

Quote Russ Baker
“It sounded preposterous. Cubans in surgical gloves bugging the DNC! I dismissed it as some sort of prank . . . The whole thing made so little sense. Why, I wondered. Why then? Why in such a blundering way . . . Anyone who knew anything about politics would know that a national committee headquarters was a useless place to go for inside information on a presidential campaign. The whole thing was so senseless and bungled that it almost looked like some kind of a setup.“
Nixon was actually suggesting not just a setup, but one intended to harm him.

At a press conference June 22, President Nixon denied that the White House was involved in the incident.
It’s obvious that this is a set-up to smear Nixon. The Fielding psychiatrist break-in made him look unethical – wanting to see Ellsberg’s journal - and this break-in makes him look like a potential blackmailer.

Quote Russ Baker
The conclusion one would likely draw from their being caught red-handed is that Dick Nixon is up to yet another manifestation of his twisted and illegal inclinations. And what were they listening to? Purportedly, DNC personnel were arranging for “dates” for distinguished visitors with a call-girl ring. […] The conclusion is that Nixon was perhaps trying to sexually blackmail the Democrats. It got more and more objectionable.

But was smearing Nixon the only reason for the break-in?

When Colodny and Gettlin’s book ‘Silent Coup’ was published in 1992, Liddy (one of the burglars) in an interview revealed the real reason for the Watergate break-in.

Quote – Spartacus Article
In 1992 John Dean began legal action against Len Colodny and Gordon Liddy. Dean objected to information that appeared in books by Liddy and Colodny that claimed that Dean was the mastermind of the Watergate burglaries and the true target of the break-in was to destroy information implicating him and his wife in a prostitution ring. The case was dismissed by the U.S. District Court in Baltimore after jurors could not reach a verdict.

So it looks like they caught two birds with one stone …

In October 2001 Dean and his wife brought the case to court again – and lost.

But back to 1972

Bob Woodward

Quote Russ Baker
The accepted narrative of Nixon as the villain of Watergate is based largely on the work of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein. They both were young reporters on the Washington Post’s Metro desk when the story fell into their laps.

When ‘it fell into their laps’? Sounds quite innocent, right?
But as we shall see, this is no coincidence. Woodward was monitoring the police radio when they caught the burglars in the Watergate building.

So let’s take a look at Woodward – who was he?

Quote Russ Baker
Woodward did not fit the profile of the typical daily print reporter. Young, midwestern, Republican, he attended Yale on an ROTC scholarship and then spent five years in the Navy. He had begun with a top-secret security clearance on board the USS Wright, specializing in communications, including with the White House. His commanding officer was Rear Admiral Robert O. Welander, who would later be implicated in the military spy ring in the Nixon White House

We know Welander – he was the second admiral to receive whatever Radford could secretly copy from Kissinger.

Quote Russ Baker
According to Silent Coup, an exhaustive study of the military espionage scandal, Woodward then arrived in Washington, where he worked on the staff of Admiral Thomas Moorer, chief of naval operations, again as a communications officer, this time one who provided briefings and documents to top brass in the White House on national security matters. According to this account, in 1969–70, Woodward frequently walked through the basement offices of the White House West Wing with documents from Admiral Moorer to General Alexander Haig, who served under Henry Kissinger.

Remember Admiral Moorer? He was the one giving Radford orders to spy on Kissinger. And here Woodward is on Moorer’s staff – and walking in the basement with documents from Moorer to Haig. Hmmm. That didn’t come up in the Watergate investigation.
Russ Baker interviewed Woodward in 2008 and he categorically denied having any intelligence connections.

Quote Russ Baker
He also denied having worked in the White House or providing briefings there. “It’s a matter of record in the Navy what I did, what I didn’t do,” Woodward said. “And this Navy Intelligence, Haig and so forth, you know, I’d be more than happy to acknowledge it if it’s true. It just isn’t. Can you accept that?”

Of course, he had a cover story – and he clinged to it, quite forcefully.
But after seeing quotes from Colodny and Gettlin’s book ‘Silent Coup’ – referenced by both Hersh, Stones, and Baker – I’m convinced they did a thorough investigation.

Quote Russ Baker
At a minimum, Woodward’s entry into journalism received a valuable outside assist, according to an account provided by Harry Rosenfeld, a retired Post editor, to the Saratogian newspaper in 2004: “Bob had come to us on very high recommendations from someone in the White House. He had been an intelligence officer in the Navy and had served in the Pentagon.”

Well, down the drain went Woodward’s claim, that he had no connection to Navy Intelligence.  
According to both Russ Baker and Roger Stone, Woodward and Haig had a past relationship from their time in Naval Intelligence.

Quote Roger Stone
Colodny and Gettlin tracked Woodward’s career back to his job working in naval intelligence as a briefer for Alexander Haig. Woodward, by way of his work for Haig, led Colodny and Gettlin back to the White House, to Watergate, and eventually, to John Dean.

And here we have John Dean in the mix. Which comes as no surprise – since he became the link between the White House and the Watergate Committee. He showed his true face when he became one of the most important witnesses for the prosecution, as we shall see.

Quote Russ Baker
This raises the question of whether the “high White House official” who recommended Woodward to former Naval Intelligence officer Ben Bradlee and/or former Navy secretary Ignatius at the Post was not Haig himself. That Haig, who was working in the Pentagon’s Operations office in 1963, also had something to do with Jaworski’s becoming the Watergate prosecutor, poses intriguing questions— as does almost everything about this remarkable circle of friends.

The Watergate break-in was on June 17. On August 1, Woodward and Bernstein published their first article. From August to the election in November nobody picked up the story.

Quote Hersh
“The New York Times routinely followed up the Post’s stories but never mobilized an independent investigation of its own. . . . And the Los Angeles Times, the only other paper with the necessary investigative resources, did not show strongly until well after the election . . .

As you might recall, we have seen Los Angeles Times on a previous occasion publish an article, that Kissinger probably was behind.

The first Woodward article was published in August, the election was in November.
So it looks like the Los Angeles Times was MSM as we see them today: A Mouthpiece for the Cabal agenda. I guess, the Cabal wanted Nixon to stay in Office – until they were ready to install a non-elected Cabal-puppet president.

Nixon and Agnew were reelected, despite the Woodward articles.

Alexander Haig - Chief of Staff

When I look at this picture, I feel sorry for Nixon. Haig is dominant, Nixon the Underdog. Nixon admires Haig – not recognizing a Devil in disguise.

Conflict had been building between Nixon and Kissinger – which left Nixon isolated – and Haig had been ready to move in. He became Chief of staff May 4, 1973 after Haldeman resigned in April.

I wrote a lot about Haig in Part 31 - so I will just conclude: The conspirators were successful. They now had their man in a central position – from where he did a lot of harm.

It was far from popular with the staff, that Haig was nominated Chief of Staff. Haldeman had trusted his staff – but Haig micro-managed every little detail.

Quote Spartacus
When Haig learned at a staff meeting of a decision that had been made without consulting him, Bull recalls that Haig "began pounding the table with his fist... and said two or three times, `I am the chief of staff. I make all the decisions in the White House.' We thought he was crazy." Such outbursts would characterize Haig's responses even to decisions made on nonpolicy matters such as the president's daily schedule. According to Bull, Haig at one point said, "If you think that this president can run the country without Al Haig... you are mistaken."

How Secretary of State Rogers left office

As we have seen in the two previous parts, Kissinger wanted to get rid of Secretary Rogers – Nixon’s so-called friend, whom he didn’t stand up for.  

A few weeks after Nixon’s re-election in November 1972, he decided to nominate Kenneth Rush, Laird’s deputy in the Pentagon, as Secretary of State.

Quote Hersh
Haldeman, in his memoirs, recalled that he was left with “the unenviable task of telling Richard Nixon’s closest personal friend in the government [Rogers] that Richard Nixon had decided it was now time for him to leave.”

Rogers refused to resign and Nixon didn’t press any further. Haldeman then had the unpleasant task to inform Kissinger.
“The explosion was predictable,” Haldeman said.

There was cool air between Kissinger and Nixon those days and in a conversation with Colson, his personal aide, Nixon said: “It’s time for Henry to go back to Harvard.”

Rush was told he would be nominated Deputy Secretary of State – and get the Secretary job when Roberts resigned. Nixon delivered on the first part and nominated Rush as Deputy Secretary of State, in February 1973.

Tensions had been building since the 1967 war – in which Israel invaded Egypt – increasing the size of Israel four times. Rogers, for once, was able to act as Secretary of State.

Quote Hersh
White House preoccupation with China, Russia, Vietnam, and reelection left Rogers with a free hand in the Middle East in the first half of 1971. In those months, the first signs of a peace agreement between Israel and Egypt suddenly became visible as Anwar Sadat, Egypt’s new President, made a series of significant concessions.

Kissinger was busy elsewhere – but he couldn’t let Rogers get a victory like this. He heatedly warned Nixon of the danger of “continued American support for the Rogers initiative” – and it was stifled.
Nixon being a wimp once again.
And this was not the only attack on Rogers.

Quote Hersh
Stuart Symington, the Missouri Democrat, declared in a Senate speech that Kissinger was “Secretary of State in everything but title” and Rogers was the object of ridicule in official Washington. “It is rather sad that wherever one goes in the afternoon or evening around this town,” Symington said, “one hears our very able Secretary of State laughed at, because they say he’s only the Secretary of State in name.”

Nixon called this ‘a cheap shot’ – but he didn’t do anything to let Rogers be Secretary of State in more than name.
On the contrary. He cooperated with Kissinger in disastrous actions in Vietnam, Pakistan, and other countries. No matter what State Department tried to inform Nixon about – or what ambassadors had to say about their actions – he and Kissinger just continued their own policies.

And as previously mentioned: Nixon wasn’t even man enough to face disagreement. Nixon had urged Rogers – via Haldeman - to make a supportive statement about Nixon’s refusal to permit his staff to testify to the Watergate Committee on grounds of executive privilege. Rogers denied complying with this.
Next, Nixon made Haig contact Rogers two times to get a resignation. The second time - as Rogers tells Hersh - he sent a message back to Nixon:

Quote Hersh
Haig finally came one night to my home and said that ‘The President wants you to either make the statement or resign.’ I said no, I wouldn’t resign unless the President asked me to. ‘This is an order from your Commander in Chief,’ Haig said. I said, ‘You can tell the Commander in Chief to go fuck yourself.’ Haig was shocked. ‘Are you telling the President to go fuck himself?’ ‘No,’ ” Rogers replied, “ ‘I’m telling you to tell the Commander in Chief to go fuck himself.’ ” After that, Rogers had few problems with Haig.

A few weeks later Nixon finally had a meeting with Rogers where he asked him to resign. Rogers agreed immediately.

Quote Hersh
“And still Nixon said nothing to me,” Kissinger complained in his memoirs, adding that he was not officially told about his nomination until less than a day before it was announced.

According to one of Kissinger’s aides, Kissinger had threatened to resign several times. And doing that in the middle of the Watergate scandal was quite a threat. So when Nixon finally decided to nominate Kissinger as Secretary of State – instead of  Rush - it was probably a Watergate defense.

Rogers resigned on September 3, 1973, and 19 days later, on September 22, Kissinger got the coveted title of Secretary of State.

As previously mentioned, Kissinger went to a Bilderberg meeting in Sweden, on May 11-13, 1973, where he received orders about the Yom Kippur war.
And October 6 – October 25 the Yom Kippur war took place.
From his point of view, he must have been very successful, both stopping Rogers’ peace negotiation between Israel and Egypt – and getting his job. 

Secretary of State Rogers was back in his law practice in New York when Haldeman paid him a surprise visit – asking what to do? (Which refers to Haldeman being one of the Watergate victims, as we shall see.)

Quote, Hersh interview with Rogers
The former Secretary of State laughed disdainfully as he recalled the meeting. “I didn’t know what to tell him,” he said. Rogers had turned down a chance for revenge in late April 1973, when Nixon asked him to inform Haldeman that it was his turn to resign in the Watergate scandal. The Secretary of State refused to do what Haldeman had so willingly done to him, and told Nixon he would have to fire his chief aide himself.

’Fire him yourself’ he said to Nixon, and ‘Tell him to go fuck himself’ he said to Haig.
This is a man with integrity - who can mark a line.

Vicepresident Ford

Vice President Agnew was accused of several charges after the 1972 election – to which he declared himself innocent. He finally agreed to one charge of tax-evasion and resigned in October 1973. He wrote his memoirs in which he repeated, that he defended his actions.  

Two months later Ford was installed as VP under the terms of the 25^th Amendment.

Ford himself invoked the 25th Amendment nine months later, when he nominated Nelson Rockefeller as Vice President, after Nixon’s resignation.

Did you know, that the 25th Amendment wasn't ratified until February 1967? This means that it was unconstitutional when LBJ was sworn in on the airplane - two hours after the assassination of JFK.
But the 25th Amendment was ratified before Ford was sworn in as VP.
How convenient.

Why Ford? Nixon was strongarmed into accepting Gerald Ford by democrats in Congress. “We gave Nixon no choice but Ford” the Speaker of the House later boasted.

The only thing I knew about him was, that he had been in the Warren Commission … The Warren Commission, that landed on the ‘One Bullet theory’ that I wrote about in Part 10. But he did more than agree with that cover-up.

Quote Roger Stone
FBI documents declassified in 2006 detail even more about Ford’s role as the FBI informant and agent and the crucial role Ford played in doctoring the autopsy to accommodate the cover-up. […]
“Ford indicated he would keep me thoroughly advised as to the activities of the Commission,” DeLoach wrote in a memo. “He stated this would have to be done on a confidential basis, however, he thought it should be done.”

Not exactly a great reference - being part of the corrupt Warren Commission, doctoring the autopsy report, and furthermore leaking to the FBI!

No, not exactly great references - but this was the man the Conspirators wanted.

When Nixon later resigned, Ford became the first un-elected president – with Nelson Rockefeller, one of the 13 bloodlines, as VP.

Now we are finally ready to look at how the ‘Watergate Scandal’ played out

To be continued …
Link to Part 33 here

Links

Who’s who list

Family of Secrets by Russ Baker
https://archive.org/details/familyofsecretsb0000bake_r7l6/page/161/mode/2up

Committee of 300 by John Coleman
https://archive.org/details/conspirators-hierarchy-the-story-of-the-committee-of-300-dr.-john-coleman/page/n158/mode/1up?view=theater&q=Haig

Tricky Dick by Roger Stone
https://archive.org/details/trickydickrisefa0000ston/page/63/mode/2up

Seymour Hersh, Price of Power – Kissinger in Nixon’s White House
https://archive.org/details/priceofpowerkiss0000hers/page/21/mode/1up?view=theater

Bilderberg meeting maj 1973
https://historyheist.com/at-the-bilderberg-meeting-in-saltsjobaden-sweden-a-major-topic-is-a-400-increase-in-the-price-of-opec-oil-in-the-very-near-future/

25^th Amendment
https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/how-jfks-assassination-led-to-a-constitutional-amendment-2

Operation 40 – a mix of valid info and guesses, IMO
https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKoperation40.htm

Dean’s girlfriend sues Liddy a second time for defamatory remarks – and loses again
https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/Unpublished/011266.U.pdf

Spartacus article
https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKgettlin.htm