The Bigger Picture - Part 28

Let's look at the 60's and 70's - Part 2

As I wrote in the last article I was part of the hippie movement in Denmark and I see a lot of value in this breaking away from conventionality.
It’s been tough to look at critics of this period, like John Coleman whom I quoted in the last article.
But as time has passed and my research has dug deeper, I’ve come to some conclusions. Which are:
The Cabal exploited that which for the freedom movement was a natural evolvement, and exposed the movement’s extremists, such as Allen Ginsberg and Timothy Leary, through the MSM in order to disrupt family life, religion, morals, and values – and sow division. So let’s look into that claim.

We felt free in our bodies – and the MSM focused on bare skin.
We felt free in movement – and Hollywood started making movies that were more sexual than sensual - and showed scenes that provoked modesty.
Free love became physical and experimental – and the Cabal introduced pornography.
We looked into spirituality outside Christianity – which the Cabal used to make us look like fanatic idiots and thereby sow division between us and Christians. 

Quote from this article:
Once the traditional arguments were dismissed as meaningless, hope would be born for a new world free of tradition's savage competition, hatred for others and desire for power. Free of materialistic enslavement we would see the error of the old ways and people everywhere could live in peace. The idea encompassed every sort of freedom, beginning with freedom from racial, sexual, and religious biases, from the arrogance of power, and stupidity, and from disregard for the environment and life. 

For sure, there was a lot of naiveté in the movement – as well as bad actors taking advantage of the situation. And worst of all: The Cabal/The CIA spread loads of LSD among young people.

Let’s dig in.

Protesting wars

We looked into the Vietnam War in Part 26.

In Part 25 is a video of old men who fought in the Korean war. It’s heartbreaking to hear them talk about the first time they killed someone.
And I guess, that one aspect of sending so many young people to war was to break down morality.
Up until today, my favorite article is still part 13, where I described the agenda of breaking down morality. That is not an easy thing to do if it rests on a solid foundation of a healthy shame- and guilt system. Let me remind you that shame has to do with Being and guilt has to do with Doing.
What do you think killing another human being does to those systems? Can a man say “I AM okay?” and “what I DID was okay” after killing? From a brainwashed brain, for sure they could. They believed they were fighting for good. But I doubt those statements would be wholehearted. 

More and more people were frustrated about the draft. “Why should my son go to Vietnam?” “Why are we fighting over there?”
Mohammed Ali became a hero when he said: “No one in Vietnam would call me a nigger so why should I go and fight him?”
They took away his belt and sent him to five years in prison for refusing the draft. Which sounds like apples and oranges to me. What did his belt have to do with him refusing to kill?
But at least, that punishment turned even more of the population against the Vietnam War.

In the last article, we also looked at Martin Luther King being a fierce critic of that war.

Quote this article
The Vietnam war protests brought together a range of activists who spoke out against abuses of hegemonic authority of whatever stripe and made common cause for freedom of lifestyle in a society that had begun to question the rightness of the status quo in which repression of minorities of every stripe was accepted as the normative state of affairs.

The antiwar sentiment became stronger as more and more young men were conscripted in the draft. Black people protested, that they could be sent to war as equals to white people – only to come back home and be treated as “LESS.”
As the truth about what really happened in the Gulf of Tonkin was uncovered – and the war casualties mounted – so did the resistance.

Summer of love, the music - and the hippies

Many people in previous generations did not talk about love or show love and affection in public. Then came 1967 – which became known as the Summer of Love.

From this article
People, mostly young, tired of the pompous cliches and worn out admonitions of their parents, decided that with the dawning of the Age of Aquarius they would no longer need the sanctions of the hegemony to survive in life. Instead, they put their faith in an open set of values that were at the same time naively honest, revolutionary, and kind, but those which, above all, celebrated life. For most celebrants their revels represented more than appeasing appetites, as the "roaring 20's" parties did; the new generation had a cultic concern for making and living in a better world, and backing away from repressive cold war behavioral codes and the military mentality that characterized American political rhetoric.

That life attitude sounds good to me. But, of course, idealism and reality are not the same. Some succeeded in living in line with their values. Some went ‘back to Earth,’
they became self-sufficient and had far less consumption than the general population.

While some of the City dwellers got caught up in drugs.

People had had enough of wars and inequality. They were tired of living up to some measures set by previous generations. They wanted freedom to express themselves – and music became both an escape and a celebration. Lots of Clubs presented the new music – and were filled with happy, dancing people. Festivals became a “thing” – Woodstock is probably the best known.

Jefferson Airplane saw the other side of love, the darkness. They saw something dark coming and they warned us:

Max Yasgur, the farmer who lent his land for the Woodstock Festival addressed the audience and said:

The important thing that you’ve proven to the world is that a half a million kids, and I call you kids because I have children that are older than you are, a half a million young people can get together and have three days of fun and music and have nothing but fun and music and God bless you for it!

The dark side of the movement was the drugs, however – like LSD.

Aldous Huxley, LSD - and other drugs.

CIA experiments to make people docile began in the 1950s and have been going on for decades since – electroshock, lobotomy, Prozac …
Psychiatrist Peter Breggin, from 50m in this video

And then there was LSD – invented by the Swiss pharmaceutical company, SANDOZ, following the discovery by one of its chemists, Albert Hoffman, how to make synthetic ergotamine, a powerful mind-altering drug.

As we know, it was used by the CIA to make brainwashing experiments for a long time before it was sent to the civil population – as we saw in Part 8.

According to Coleman the Committee of 300 financed the project through one of their banks, S. C. Warburg (I wrote about the Warburg family in Part 20. They are from the level below the 13 bloodlines and CFR members.)
The drug was carried to America by the philosopher, Aldous Huxley ... Huxley?

I don’t know if Coleman is right about Huxley. His book Brave New World swept the world – and most of us saw it as a warning, like the 1984 novel – a warning about what the future would hold if we did not wake up and fight back.
I guess that Coleman is wrong about this. He is probably right that the Huxley family is part of the Committee of 300. But Aldous might have seen the horror plan and decided to warn us.
Or his books could be seen as the usual Cabal Strategy: Reveal your plans openly and then – if people get caught up in the Cabal agenda – it’s our own fault. We were warned.

But warning or prediction, the book talks about altering the DNA – which should be a current, important focus of attention.

Quote from The Committee of 300:
The new "wonder drug" was promptly distributed in "sample" size packages, handed out free of charge on college campuses across the United States and at "rock" concerts, which became the leading vehicle for proliferating the use of drugs. The question that cries out for an answer is, what was the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) doing at the time? There is compelling circumstantial evidence that would appear to indicate that the DEA knew what was going on but was ordered not to take any action.

On college campuses? Yes, Harvard among others – delivered by a professor, Timothy Leary.

Timothy Leary

Leary’s life has been covered extensively, not least in his own memoirs. Trained as a psychologist, he was forty years old and a professor at Harvard when he went to Mexico, in 1960, and tried psychedelic mushrooms for the first time. He returned to Harvard, placed an order with Sandoz, and began the Harvard Psilocybin Project.

What comes to mind is: Imagine being a client of this psychologist? Or a student? What a horror fantasy! He gave away LSD to students, abandoning clinical protocols.  I wonder if the Cabal saw how effective this was in regard to their own agenda and if this sparked the idea to place Cabal puppets in Universities? Which they have done for decades.

Quote from this article about Timothy Leary
Harvard fired Leary, in 1963, when his informal dispensary attracted too much controversy. With assistance from the heirs to the Mellon fortune, Leary moved what was still nominally a research institution to Millbrook, in upstate New York.

Mellon? Remember that family? In part 15 we saw, that the Mellon Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation funded Gladio
Furthermore, we saw a Mellon heiress, Cordelia Scaife May, who cooperated with the Population Council, which was responsible for bringing the abortion pill to the US. She was an admirer of Margaret Sanger, Planned Parenthood, where she worked.
She sat on the board of the Population Council – and contributed $11.4 million to the Council’s work during the 1960s. She kept on working for Planned Parenthood for decades.

Timothy Leary invited Allen Ginsberg, the “poet” to Cambridge to participate in his studies of the newly synthesized chemical psilocybin. Ginsberg responded with enthusiasm, then listed his qualifications – and I shall spare you that drug list. But let’s look at this man.

Allen Ginsberg

In 1956 Allen Ginsberg debuted his famous poem Howl, which was a confrontation with what Ginsberg considered the “destructive materialism and conformity of the post-war period.” The poem's references to Ginsberg's homosexuality and experimentation with illegal drugs led to 520 copies of the poem being seized in 1957. Shortly thereafter, publisher Lawrence Ferlinghetti was charged with distributing obscene writings. He won the case when the judge, Clayton Horn, expressed that the poem had social relevance. The case was covered in many American and European media and contributed to Howl gaining a wide readership both in and outside the United States.

Ginsberg was a homosexual – a sexual preference that John Coleman often refers to as “Sodomist.” – Not that he is the only one using that term. Which is a misnomer, according to this article.
The essence of the explanation is: Forcible anal sex, with one male, homosexually raping another male anally.
So I assume Ginsberg and a lot of others were homosexuals – not sodomists.

The Freedom movement also became synonymous with breaking old taboos – and lesbians and homosexuals started parading in the streets, demanding to be accepted as equals.
Which probably provoked a lot of people.

It sure looked like Ginsberg reveled in that kind of attention. And he got a huge amount of attention.  

Quote The Committee of 300:
Ginsberg pushed the use of LSD through advertising which cost him nothing, although under normal circumstances it would have cost millions of dollars in TV advertising revenues. This free advertising for drugs, and LSD in particular, reached a new high in the late 1960s, thanks to the ever-willing cooperation of the media. The effect of Ginsberg's mass advertising campaign was devastating; the American public was subjected to one cultural future shock after another in rapid succession.

To assist him in his task, Ginsberg coopted the services of Norman Mailer, a writer of sorts who had spent some time in a mental institution. Mailer was a favorite of the leftwing Hollywood crowd and so had no problem with getting maximum television time for Ginsberg. Naturally, Mailer had to have a pretext-- not even he could blatantly come out with the true nature of Ginsberg's television appearances. So a charade was adopted: Mailer would talk "seriously" on camera with Ginsberg about poetry and literature.

Cabal strategy or Natural Development?

I have argued that the Freedom Movement and the wave of new music were a natural evolutions. There had been built so much fear for decades and it was natural – from my perspective – that a transition to staccato music was a result. Bodies releasing stress in one way or another. Let me explain.

I took workshops with a Shaman in the 90s in 5 Rhythms. We danced 10 hours a day – for days.
My teacher described the rhythms like this:
The first rhythm is Flowing. Sensuality – or the dark side: Fear.
The second rhythm is Staccato. Excitement – or the dark side: Anger
The third rhythm is Chaos. No Control - Letting Go
The fourth rhythm is Lyrical. Lightness – To Float
And the fifth rhythm is Stillness. Peace
He compared the positive side with sex: Building up, intercourse, orgasm, lightness, and peace.

I mention this because - from my perspective – the hippies moved away from a lot of fear and expressed anger through music and dance. Rock music is staccato.

But the question is: Did the Cabal build up all this fear and anger in order to get a reaction like that – as Coleman and others argue?
Or did they take advantage of what was a natural evolution?
Does it matter?

Remember Shock and Awe? We looked at that brainwashing technique in Part 25 – introduced by Bernay: “If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind [collective subconscious], it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without them knowing it."

I believe it was a natural evolvement – and I’m sure the Cabal took advantage of this.
We released ourselves from the boundaries which had limited previous generations. But for many people in the movement, this resulted in unhealthy limitlessness. In regards to drugs for example.

We saw limitlessness in another area of human life – sexuality.
Like Prince sings: “Anything goes.”

Sex

The contraceptive pill changed sexual behavior and for some, it encouraged promiscuity. It looks like it ignited a sexual revolution.
Not only did we now have a contraceptive pill but in January 1973 there was a verdict, Roe v Wade, that made abortion legal. 

If you have read Part 13 about neuropsychology you will know that one of my theses is, that the Cabal wants to demoralize us. And in order to be able to do that they had to destroy the foundation of morals, which is a healthy shame and guilt system. There is a healthy part of the shame system – that I still haven’t found a fitting English word for. But it is the opposite of promiscuity. And this “modesty” “shyness” - or whatever is the right term – was damaged back then.

Let’s take a brief look at a Jung theory: Women have an inner masculine ideal, the Animus. Men’s inner feminine ideal is Anima.
When we fall in love we project our inner ideal, Anima/Animus, onto the partner and fall in love with this projection.
The projection holds from 6 months to two years. Then it is dissolved and we see the partner as he/she is – and we either love our partner or think “what did I see in him/her.”

Neuropsychologists have since found that we only fall in love if there is a genetic match.

Before the 1960s it was common for a couple to get pregnant before those first two years passed. The nuclear family was the way most people wanted to live.

But with the contraception pill and legal abortion as a possibility, there wasn’t the same incentive to start a family in a hurry. Add on top of that: The women were out on the labor market, and many wanted to make a career – which meant that for many couples the first two years of being in love passed. We began to see people moving from one partner to another – or getting a divorce if they were already married.  

Years ago I saw a questionnaire survey that was conducted in American universities. It had to do with what makes a boy a man and a girl a woman.
The result was:
For men: provide, protect, and impregnate
For women: nourish, encourage, and give birth.

If we could have made such a survey with cavemen and -women I guess we would have gotten the same answers.

But today?

Hollywood and MSM’s part in Disrupting the Culture

As I started this article: The Cabal exploited that which for the freedom movement was a natural evolvement, and exposed the movement’s extremists, such as Allen Ginsberg and Timothy Leary, through the MSM in order to disrupt family life, religion, morals, and values – and sow division.

On the one hand, the MSM gave a lot of exposure to the movement. On the other hand, they did it in the most provocative way possible.
If we look from the elder generation’s perspective we see shocking sexual exposure and distance from tradition. And worst of all we see a decline in morality.

Hollywood made one movie after another where couples got divorced, kids were raised by single parents, we saw seduction - and no longer a single pajamas in the bedroom.

We saw movies like Easy Rider – men with no urge to provide and protect.

Maybe worst of all is, that pornography was no longer limited to magazines like Playboy – it became an industry.
And I’m sad to say, that Denmark was the first country in which it was made legally.

We protested against wars – so the Cabal could no longer kill us that way. But they found new ways to kill the nuclear family – the foundation of a healthy society.

In part 12 we looked at KGB’s “Rules of Revolution”:

Here are a few Points from those Rules:
Corrupt the young, get them interested in sex, and take them away from religion. Make them superficial and enfeebled.
Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial issues of no importance.
Cause breakdown of the old moral virtues: honesty, sobriety, self-restraint, faith in the pledged word.

In Denmark, more than half of marriages ends in divorce. I’ve sometimes wondered why they were able to stay married in previous generations? Even stay in arranged marriages? The first answer, of course, is because of duty, obligation, and obedience to the rules of society and religion. But I*m sure many of those marriages were good families.

A couple of decades ago wedding vows changed here in Denmark. Previously we said yes to love “till death do us part.” But as the divorce rate climbed it became apparent that people didn’t stick to that vow.
Some countries, cultures, and religions still do - as can be seen in some wedding vows from various religions - here

I shall be released The Band, Bob Dylan Ringo Starr, Ronnie Wood, Joni Mitchell, Neil Young, Neil Diamond, Ronnie Hawkins and Van Morrison.

Links

Women’s right to vote
https://www.insider.com/when-women-around-the-world-got-the-right-to-vote-2019-2

Article about Huxley and Brave New World
https://www.huxley.net

Bob Dylan Masters of war – with photos

The science of the psychedelic renaissance
https://www.newyorker.com/books/under-review/the-science-of-the-psychedelic-renaissance

Hippies
https://www.britannica.com/topic/hippie

25 Timothy Leary quotes
https://everydaypower.com/timothy-leary-quotes/

Timothy Leary biographies
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Timothy-Leary
https://www.biography.com/scientist/timothy-leary

What does the Bible say about anal sex
https://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-anal-sex-sodomy.html

The Committee of 300
https://archive.org/details/conspirators-hierarchy-the-story-of-the-committee-of-300-dr.-john-coleman/page/n134/mode/1up?view=theater

Tavistock Institute
https://archive.org/details/Tavistock_201601/page/n1/mode/2up?view=theater

Operation Gladio
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2021/09/11/operation-gladio-global-subversion/

Prince video