I’ve named this series The Big Picture. And let me remind you what I wrote in the first two articles. There are two Big Pictures, the White Hats, and the Black Hats. Those two images can be superimposed and thus form a Full Big Picture.
I’ve focused on the Black Hats Big Picture – because from my perspective it’s necessary to see those “details” in order to see the Full Big Picture.
Up until now, the articles are almost in chronological order. From 600AD to 1963.
Let me make an exception and start this article with a present-day viewpoint.
A week ago, President Trump was about to make a statement. In the days up to that statement, the MSM talked about it daily – as did we in the movement. We guessed what he would announce.
At one end of the scale was “Running in 2024” – which many of us found would be a disappointment, not enough after such a build-up.
At the other end were “Reveal the Swamp,” “Reveal the fraud in the Midterms,” and some even went as far as expecting “Mass-arrests.”
Trump announced “Running in 2024” and a lot of people in the movement were disappointed – including me.
Even though I know, that expectation and disappointment are proportional. Even though my attitude towards this is: Disappointment is a feeling, MY feeling, ergo my responsibility.
So I had to face, that I had expected too much. I had set the bar too high. I forgot that the bar must rest on one more column: Illusion/Reality.
And the reality is, that even though I’ve seen many parts of the Big Picture, there are still a lot of details that I do not know - that only Trump and his close allies know.
Let’s look at the 60’s.
Half a year ago, when I read Dr. John Coleman's books, I was appalled by his judgmental attitude towards what was my youth, the 60’s, and 70s.
Quote Coleman
The Beatles did a perfect job, or perhaps it would be more correct to say that Tavistock and Stanford did a perfect job, the Beatles merely reacting like trained robots "with a little help from their friends"--code words for using drugs and making it "cool." The Beatles became a highly visible "new type"-- more Tavistock jargon--and as such, it was not long before the group made new styles (fads in clothing, hairstyles and language usage) which upset the older generation, as was intended.
I dismissed this as Coleman’s opinion. It seems like he is talking about himself being of an “older generation” that is “upset.”
I see his views on beat music and youth rebellion as uninformed and judgmental, AND I haven’t lost respect for his other work, based on research.
There is, after all, a difference between facts and opinions.
From my perspective, the Beatles were needed to shake things up. Just look at the girls in this video how happy and excited they are
Coleman’s work has been part of my research for the last months before writing my articles. I have found his research sound. Therefore, doubt crept in, could I be wrong? Were the Beatles planted? A Tavistock creation? I’ve mentioned it to several people and they had heard something like that before.
Then, thank goodness, I have found proof that some of his claims are wrong. Like this:
Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together by the Tavistock Institute, came other "Made in England" rock groups, who, like the Beatles, had Theo Adorno write their cult lyrics and compose all the "music." I hate to use these beautiful words in the context of "Beatlemania.”
The first to make the claim, that someone named Theo Adorno wrote their lyrics and music, was Olavo Carvalho – a Brazilian Guru.
Quote
The band ‘barely knew how to play the guitar, and their songs were written by the leading member of the Frankfurt School, Theo Adorno.
Olavo Carvalho was a self-taught philosopher and author of ‘The Collective Imbecile’ and ‘The Least You Need To Know Not To Be An Idiot.’
Quote from another article
In a recent video lecture for his online school Seminario de Filosofia, the Brazilian right’s favorite philosopher Ovalo de Carvalho recounted the conspiracy theory that the German sociologist Theodor Adorno wrote all the music and lyrics for the Beatles.
Okay, so John Coleman made a mistake, by not checking his sources. And his prejudice used that faulty platform to spread his contempt.
So be it.
As said, I asked friends, if they had heard anything about the Beatles. One said, that she had seen a picture of them – making Signs of the Devil. I have now found that picture:
What does that prove? Does it prove anything?
It reminds me of a picture of our Government standing on the stairs to Parliament a year ago – all of them covering one eye. The Freedomfighters in DK went crazy! “They are Satanic” etc. To me, there is a very big jump to that conclusion. I could imagine our Prime’s advisor – who is a young global leader – standing next to the photographer encouraging them to make some “funny” pictures, making different gestures. The bloody fools have researched nothing – as far as I can see – and probably had no idea that one of their postures was a Satanic signal.
If I can imagine another explanation there can be several others.
So this picture of Paul McCartney and John Lennon does not prove anything to me.
I’ve listened to their songs for days now – and I find nothing that makes me jump to that kind of conclusions. On the contrary, I see four silly boys having fun.
Researching the 60’s and 70’s in America have made me realize, that there were a lot of differences in the hippie movement in the US and in Denmark.
I will therefore write about the movement I know in Denmark first - and then write about segregation in the US to show the background for the American counter movement.
In Denmark 99% of the population was white at that time – and at least 90% of those were Christians. We did not have to go “counter” like the US did. So let me show you where I come from.
World Bank demonstration in Copenhagen in 1971
The generation before mine thought obedience was a must. And they used the word "respect" synonymously with "obedience".
To me, obedience is an ‘External Locus of Control’ and I prefer an ‘Internal Locus of Control’. As I wrote about in part 13, morality, norms, ethics, and rules are based on a well-established and regulated system of shame and guilt. If you have achieved such a foundation, you behave properly, morally. Not because you obey, but because you would be ashamed if you didn't behave morally. You have ‘Inner Locus of Control’.
Same with Respect, that in previous generations was a “do as you’re told” control strategy. “Re Spect” in Latin means “really see.” And so it is for me. I see others' integrity, values, standpoint, boundaries, feelings, and don’t cross their lines.
Differences of opinion, taste etc. are natural phenomena to me.
In my family obedience and respect were those old-fashioned rules and expectations – which I disliked more and more. I did not want to inherit my father’s firm - as he took for granted. I did not want to do as I was told if it went against my values and beliefs.
My mother trained me to walk on very high heels on a line on the floor - with a book on my head – to “not look like a cow like so many do in high heels.”
When I got breasts, I was told to wear a push-up bra to “look more attractive.”
I saw my mother suffer in her corset and thought of a cage.
All of this to say, I was taught to be an object. And she even said, I should never let passion rule, I should find a husband with a good education and a good income – and “Don’t you ever show him that you are smarter than him.”
I didn’t want to be an object. I had a clear recognition of myself as a subject. I didn’t want to play a role to achieve something.
So I started to do what I wanted – without letting them know.
Some music spoke to my body, some lyrics resonated in my heart. Why all this war? It was unbearable to think of all those poor souls fighting each other. For what? To put an end to war???
Donovan video ‘Universal Soldier’
When I was 17, in 1970, I started to demonstrate against the Vietnam War – and later that year against The World Bank, which had a meeting in Copenhagen. (Picture above.)
We, in our Constitution, have a right to demonstrate. But it was not tolerated that we peacefully demonstrated against the World Bank. We were hunted by police with raised clubs through the streets of Copenhagen. That was a shocking wake-up call for me. Up until that day I had trusted the police – that they were the good guys protecting We the People against the bad guys. That belief died that day and gave birth to rebellion.
I listened and sang along with a lot of the new music. I danced – not how I was taught to dance at dance school – but letting my body become an instrument, playing along.
In body, heart, and soul I moved further and further away from my family – who were not interested in what was important to me and who saw me as crazy and disobedient. And who finally kicked me out when I was 17.
In 1971 a large group of hippies occupied some disused military barracks in Copenhagen. It became our village in the middle of the City. Homebuilt houses, shops, work-shops, restaurants, music scenes, and beautiful recreational areas with canals and old trees.
One Government after another has tried to get rid of Christiania for 50 years – but it still exists.
In the last couple of years I’ve become aware, that the CIA was behind LSD, which was first used in MK Ultra and then spread out in the youth movement. First in the US, and later in Europe.
None of us knew that, back then. I have taken LSD a few times and I’ve smoked hash, back in those years. And I would do it again if time was turned back.
We only use 1/10 of our brain capacity and some of those substances send energy to the unused parts of the brain.
For the past six months, I have been in the process of looking realistically at that time - and I have to agree with Coleman and others, that LSD in the hippie movement started as a brainwashing attempt by the CIA. And I agree, that for some it was disastrous.
What the CIA didn't foresee was, that for some of us it became a strength. We saw through their smokescreens, their masks – and we resisted.
To me, this movement was a natural development from conventionality to creativity – from obedience to freedom.
In the US the movement was also a Freedom Fight – but on a more severe background.
Countermovement background in the US
Jim Crow Law enforced racial segregation between the end of Reconstruction in 1877 and the beginning of the civil rights movement in the 1950s.
From the late 1870s, legislators started passing laws requiring the separation of whites from “persons of color” in public transportation and schools. The pre-Civil War “Free Persons of Color” was abandoned. The segregation principle was extended to parks, cemeteries, theatres, and restaurants in an effort to prevent any contact between Blacks and Whites as equals.
In 1954 the Supreme Court declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional, and, by extension, that ruling was applied to other public facilities. In the years following, subsequent decisions struck down similar kinds of Jim Crow legislation.
The following quote comes from an article that has a much more positive look at President Johnson than I do – as you may have seen in my last article. It talks about how LBJ “empowered” local action initiatives to combat poverty.
Placing local black leaders (supported by federal stipends) in charge of implementing such programs sometimes drew the resentment of local white politicians and members of the law enforcement community. This resentment often resulted in official toleration of acts of uniformed brutality on black people, behavior that too often went unpunished. As animosities continued to fester, an already frustrated and angry black population in America's cities violently took that sense of unfairness to the streets in the form of demonstrations, looting, and the destruction of property.
I have previously written about Gladio - the CIA undercover group that instigated riots and assassinations in most of Europe and elsewhere for decades. This looks like the same playbook from my perspective, so I do not see the Cabal puppet, LBJ, as innocent in the escalation of the black against white conflicts that happened.
Especially not because he simultaneously sent both white and black men to fight in the disgusting Vietnam War, that I wrote about in the last article. And just to be clear: I’m not giving LBJ all the blame either.
Major race riots had occurred all over the US for decades and escalated in the 60s.
Malcolm X (1925 – 1965)
Malcolm X was a human rights activist and a became a spokesman for Nation of Islam, (NOI). He encouraged blacks to cast of the shackles of racism ‘by any means necessary’. Including violence. His father was a civil rights activist and the family was subjected to frequent harassment from white supremacist groups – including the Ku Klux Klan. His father died when Malcolm was 6 years old. Some sources claim he was killed by white supremacists.
Quote from his autobiography
Some kind of psychological deterioration hit our family circle and began to eat away our pride
He dropped out of high school and became involved with the criminal underground in Boston and it didn’t take long before he started selling drugs. His life turned more and more criminal and at 21 years old he ended up in prison. He got a 10-year sentence but was released after 6 years.
He converted to Islam and joined the NOI, a small sect of black Muslims. Their ideology was about black nationalism. They wanted to establish their own state separate from white Americans – which they saw as the only way to achieve freedom, justice, and equality. NOI grew from a mere 400 members at the time he was released from prison in 1952, to 40,000 members by 1960.
He became a Minister and spokesperson for NOI and it turned out that he was an ‘articulate, passionate, and a naturally gifted and inspirational orator.’
Beginning in the 1960s, Malcolm was invited to participate in numerous debates, including forums on radio stations, television programs, and universities.
In 1963, the New York Times reported that Malcolm X was the second most sought-after speaker in the United States. In 1963 Malcolm led the Unity Rally in Harlem which was one of the nation’s largest civil rights events.
Malcolm X was one of Martin Luther King’s fiercest critics. He attacked King’s message of nonviolence. But he also respected King as a ‘fellow leader of our people’ and sent him articles and invitations to participate in meetings throughout the early 60s.
In 1964 he broke ties with NOI and went on a pilgrimage to Mecca - during which he converted to traditional Islam.
After his epiphany at Mecca, Malcolm X returned to the United States less angry and more optimistic about the prospects for peaceful resolutions to America's race problems.
Quote
The true brotherhood I had seen had influenced me to recognize that anger can blind human vision. America is the first country [...] that can actually have a bloodless revolution.
Tragically, just as Malcolm X appeared to be embarking on an ideological transformation with the potential to dramatically alter the course of the Civil Rights Movement, he was assassinated.
After his death Martin Luther King send a letter to Malcolm X’s widow:
While we did not always see eye to eye on methods to solve the race problem, I always had a deep affection for Malcolm and felt that he had the great ability to put his finger on the existence and root of the problem
Martin Luther King (January 15, 1929 — April 4, 1968)
MLK was a Baptist minister and a social activist who led the civil rights movement in the US from the mid-1950s until his death by assassination in 1968. His leadership was fundamental to that movement’s success in ending the legal segregation of African Americans.
MLK was interviewed on BBC in 1961, on “Face to Face.” The video shows lots of pictures about segregation.
I have enjoyed reading about MLK and watch videos with him. What I like the most is his focus on Unity. Black and White living together in peace.
That is a different approach than Malcolm X agitated for, as we have seen.
I have also looked into some people criticizing MLK – and haven’t seen evidence of their claims. They have called him an adulterer and claimed he was a plagiarist and that his Ph.D. should be withdrawn.
If you’ve read my previous articles you’ll know, that I don’t believe anyone is All Good or All Bad. We all make mistakes.
But I found the claim about plagiarism serious enough to research and found this:
When a committee concluded that it was insufficient to justify withdrawing his doctorate, people should stop making claims like “Martin Luther King did actually plagiarize his Ph.D.” In my opinion.
King was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1964.
MLK was an outspoken critic of the war in Vietnam. In 1965 he said: “millions of dollars can be spent every day to hold troops in South Viet Nam and our country cannot protect the rights of Negroes in Selma.”
He continued to criticize over the next years. As can be seen in this article
In early 1967 King stepped up his anti-war proclamations, giving similar speeches in Los Angeles and Chicago. The Los Angeles speech, called “The Casualties of the War in Vietnam,” stressed the history of the conflict and argued that American power should be “harnessed to the service of peace and human beings, not an inhumane power [unleashed] against defenseless people” (King, 25 February 1967).
I admire, that he continued to speak his mind – despite now being criticized in Washington Post, New York Times, and other MSM. We, today, know of course that they are The Cabal’s mouthpieces.
They turned the criticism further up after MLK claimed that America made “peaceful revolution impossible by refusing to give up the privileges and the pleasures that come from the immense profits of overseas investments.”
Washington Post’s response was: “King’s speech diminished his usefulness to his cause, to his country, and to his people.” Other MSM declared that he was linking “two disparate issues, Vietnam and civil rights.”
That did not stop MLK from continuing to attack US involvement in Vietnam.
They couldn’t shut MLK up – and more and more white people took part in the Freedom Movement.
The Cabal has only success when their “Divide and Conquer” agenda works. A united population is one of their worst nightmares, I believe.
Therefore, they made the MSM escalate the fabricated conflict over the next year - with statements like: “Our nation is moving towards two Societies, one Black, one White.”
King was planning to lead a “Poor Peoples March” on Washington in the summer of 1968. He was assassinated in April of that year.
If you see this video, you will recognize an agenda we also see today: A group of young people was in Memphis when King was there to support the garbage workers. They were there to stir up trouble – and they were allegedly on the FBI’s payroll.
They succeeded and the police started beating up peaceful protesters.
The group around King was despondent. King refused to give up. He pointed out that if they couldn’t have a peaceful protest in Memphis they couldn’t go to Washington. So he carried out the planned program and held a speech. (In video above.) He was on fire! That turned out to be his last speech. He was killed the next day.
And rioting broke out in more than 100 cities.
When Martin Luther King was assassinated in April 1968 Robert F Kennedy delivered the news to the people of Minneapolis, Illinois – from the back of a truck.
Robert F Kennedy was assassinated seven weeks later.
During King’s funeral a tape recording was played of a two months old speech, in which King spoke of how he wanted to be remembered after his death:
“I’d like somebody to mention that day that Martin Luther King Jr. tried to give his life serving others.”
Rest in Peace Malcolm X, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Robert F Kennedy
To be continued ….
Link to part 28 here
Links
The Guardian Article, Was Adorno the fifth Beatle?
https://www.theguardian.com/music/shortcuts/2019/sep/10/a-little-help-from-my-neo-marxist-philosopher-adorno-fifth-beatle-according-olavo-carvalho
Gladio
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2021/09/11/operation-gladio-global-subversion/
Sixties counterculture
https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/sixties-counterculture-hippies-and-beyond
The fifth Beatle – allegedly
https://www.theguardian.com/music/shortcuts/2019/sep/10/a-little-help-from-my-neo-marxist-philosopher-adorno-fifth-beatle-according-olavo-carvalho
5 beatles called conspiracy theory here
https://publicseminar.org/essays/was-theodor-adorno-the-fifth-beatle/
The black poet Langston Hughes wrote a poem that explains about the riots
https://whowhatwhy.org/uncategorized/1943-harlem-race-riot-what-the-hell-happened/
Article about Malcolm X achievements
https://malcolmx.com/achievements/
King Institute about Malcolm X
https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/malcolm-x
Loved that Jytte!! What a great history lesson! We’ll done friend!!
Beautifully done Jytte. This was my time growing up as we are the same age. The angels in past history that were taken from us is so sad. Will the evil ever be stopped?