Disclaimer: This article may contain the personal views and opinions of the author.
Before we look at Truman, I have some catching up to do.
In part 7, I wrote about a coup attempt in 1933 – and how General Smedley Butler played along for a while – after which he gave a speech on the radio revealing the plot to the American people. All those involved denied such a plot, and the media made fun of his claims. But in 1967, a special House of Representatives Committee report was finally released that confirmed Butler's claims.
In Part 7, I further wrote that President Roosevelt didn’t act to punish them in 1933.
In 1941 Roosevelt finally acted. He prosecuted many of the actors, like Bush, Walker, and Harriman, under the “Trading with the Enemy Act.”
I haven’t looked into if it had any consequences.
My source for that information was the video "JFK to 9/11" by F Conolly.
I have now looked into what consequences the coop attempt had? And I have found this is an example of “apples and oranges.”
As far as I can see, Conolly fell into this trap: “Correlation is not Causation” by stating: “In 1941 Roosevelt finally acted.”
And I fell into the trap of quoting someone I trusted instead of digging for proof that he had got it right. I apologize.
What FDR “acted on” in 1941 had nothing to do with the coup attempt in 1933.
As far as my research goes, that coup attempt never had consequences!
What FDR acted on was Harriman and Bush’s banks doing business with the Nazis. So let’s take a look at this before focusing on Truman.
I have read a book and several articles about how this all went down – and I have decided not to write much about it – and just post the links in case you are interested in the details. I’m most interested in those attempting a Coup d’Etat – and what other groups they belong to.
Coup d’Etat attempt: George H Walker, Prescot Bush, Harriman brothers.
International Banking: Prescot Bush, George H Walker, Harriman brothers.
Robber Barons: E T Harriman (father of Averell and Edward) Railroad King.
Committee of 300: Averell Harriman, George H W Bush, Prescot Bush.
Skull and Bones: Averell Harriman, Edward Harriman, Prescot Bush, George H W Bush, George W Bush.
International Banking wasn’t all they did. As you will see if you read the articles below, they financed Hitler’s rise to power – through Fritz Thyssen, the author of the book “I financed Hitler.” He and his business partners are universally recognized as the most important German financiers of Hitler’s take-over of Germany. In his book, he admitted that he had financed Hitler and the Nazi movement since 1923.
Thyssen did banking with Harriman and Bush. You can read about this, about steel companies and shipping they did together – and how they used Jews from the concentration camps in Poland as slave labor - in the articles, I link to below.
From John Buchanan’s article:
The unraveling of the web of Bush-Harriman-Thyssen U. S. enterprises, all of which operated out of the same suite of offices at 39 Broadway in New York under the supervision of Prescott Bush, began with a story that ran simultaneously in the New York Herald-Tribune and Washington Post on July 31, 1941. […]
Hitler's Angel Has $3m in US Bank.
In October 1942, the US government took over the Union Banking Corporation - in which Prescott Bush was director - under the Trading with the Enemy Act.
But, “the government announced that it was seizing only the Nazi interests, leaving the Nazis' U.S. partners to carry on the business.”
So, the Harrimans and Bushs got away with just a slap on the wrist.
Thyssen fled Germany after falling out with Hitler in 1941, but he was captured in France and detained for the remainder of the war.
My thoughts:
Roosevelt did nothing when Harriman, Bush, Walker, and others attempted to make a Coup d’état in 1933.
So I don’t know if he really wanted to act in October 1942 - but he could hardly not act after a headline like that.
What I do know is that both the Harriman brothers and the Bushs were Big Rats, as I’ve shown above.
It seemed odd to me, at first, that FDR, who was probably controlled by the Committee of 300, would do this. But as we have seen, the only consequence was a slap on the wrist – and it didn’t hinder 2xBush from becoming US Presidents.
Truman (1945-1953)
Vote Democratic for lasting peace? Let’s see about that.
Truman was Vicepresident 83 days under Roosevelt from January 20, 1945, to April 12, 1945. He did not campaign for the vice-presidential spot.
George C. Marshall became General during WWII. He was the one who deliberately kept information about a pending Japanese air attack against Pearl Harbor from the commander in Hawaii – as I wrote about in the previous article.
After taking office, Truman made Marshall “Special Envoy to China,” and in 1947, he was appointed Secretary of State. Shortly after “the outbreak” of the Korean War, he was named Secretary of Defence.
When Roosevelt died and Truman became President, he was told briefly on the afternoon of April 12, that he had a new, highly destructive weapon.
Truman, writing in his diary on July 25, 1945, quote:
We have discovered the most terrible bomb in the history of the world. It may be the fire destruction prophesied in the Euphrates Valley Era after Noah and his fabulous Ark.
Truman bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki with these atomic bombs on August 6 and 9, 1945. More than 200.000 died instantly – and in the following decades, hundreds of thousands suffered leukemia, thyroid, breast-, lung-, and other cancers.
Quote Truman
I shall give further consideration and make further recommendations to the Congress as to how atomic power can become a powerful and forceful influence towards the maintenance of world peace.
The Selective Training and Service Act
- expired in March 1947. President Truman, asserting that the peacetime army could not attract the numbers it needed to uphold its global commitments, pushed for an extension of the draft. Congress obliged, and the Selective Service Act was reenacted in June 1948.
The National Security Act
In 1947, Truman signed the National Security Act. This Act, in addition to establishing the Department of Defense (DOD), also provided for a National Security Council and the Central Intelligence Agency, CIA – and a whole lot of other agencies, as can be seen in the link above.
The United Nations, UN
As you might recall from part 22, President Wilson tried to push the US to join the League of Nations, the forerunner of the UN. Congress voted against the proposal.
Quote Coleman:
Unfortunately, it did not take the pliers of propaganda long to stage a comeback with the revamped United Nations version of the League of Nations. Truman, (not the simple hat seller from Missouri but the Master Mason) betrayed the American people by permitting this one-world edifice in the U.S. and Truman used propaganda left over by Wilson to persuade key senators to vote for his lies.
What Truman did was force the American nation to enter into a pact with the devil-the devil of power over justice and truth, justice from the barrel of a gun. We applied that "justice" in WWII through mass bombing of civilian centers without regard to loss of life and we used atomic bombs on Japan, although the war was over.
I have no doubt that the UN is major Rat Nest. At some point I’ll take a closer look -but for now let’s take one more quote. This one is from the Bilderberg Book:
The UN began with a group of Council of Foreign Relations members, CFR, called the Informal Agenda Group. They drafted the original proposal for the UN and called in three CFR attorneys, who declared it was Constitutional. They then presented the proposal to President Roosevelt, who announced it the very next day to the public.
Roosevelt presented the proposal – and the UN was established in 1945 under Truman.
The Truman doctrine
In February 1947, the GB informed the US State Department that they withdrew their financial aid to Greece and Turkey.
In a meeting in March 1947 between Congressmen and State Department officials, Undersecretary of State Dean Acheson (member of the Committee of 300 – remember that name) articulated what would later become known as the "domino theory." He stated that more was at stake than Greece and Turkey, for if those two key states should fall, communism would likely spread south to Iran and as far east as India. Acheson concluded that “not since the days of Rome and Carthage had such a polarization of power existed.” The stunned legislators agreed to endorse the program on the condition that President Truman stress the severity of the crisis in an address to Congress and a radio broadcast to the American people.
Quote Truman
It must be the policy of the United States to support free peoples who are resisting attempted subjugation by armed minorities or by outside pressures.
Transcript of Truman’s speech to Congress here:
Congress sanctioned $400 million in military and economic assistance for Greece and Turkey. According to the above-linked article, “This indicated the beginning of a long and enduring bipartisan Cold War foreign policy. Future presidential administrations would use similar reasoning to justify actions in Korea, Cuba, and Vietnam, among others.”
The Korean War
At four o’clock in the morning of 25 June 1950, the North Korean Army attacked South Korea. General MacArthur authorized the immediate shipment of ammunition from U.S. stores in Japan to South Korea. Over five days, the Administration gradually committed the US to war in Korea. The Administration did – but they did not include Congress in their “commitment.”
On July 14, Secretary of State Dean Acheson (remember him?), with the approval of President Truman, requested that the UN Security Council convene at once to consider the events in Korea.
The consensus at that meeting was that the military balance was more favorable to the US in the long run and that Russia would probably not resort to general war.
On July 27, the US again denounced the North Korean action to the UN Security Council and demanded stronger measures be taken. The UN Security Council (with the USSR delegate missing) determined that the North Korean attack was a breach of peace and, having noted that the North Korean forces had not withdrawn back to the 38th parallel nor ceased hostilities as requested, recommended that “the Members of the UN furnish such assistance to the Republic of Korea as may be necessary to repel the armed attack and to restore international peace and security in the area."
Quote Coleman
Truman would talk peace while preparing for war – and he seized powers he was not entitled to under the U.S. Constitution.
The President followed the UN proclamation with a public statement to the American people outlining his actions concerning the use of air and sea forces to support the Korean Government and the purpose of the Seventh Fleet in Formosan waters. Prior to the release of the statement President Truman and his advisors briefed a group of senior Congressional leaders of both parties on the developments in Korea and on the statement the President was about to release.
HE BRIEFED them. He didn’t suggest or ask for Congress to declare war on North Korea - which is the legal way to go to war, according to the Constitution.
Quote:
On July 28, Senator Robert A. Taft of Ohio pointed out in a speech to the Senate that he believed the Administration was responsible for the trouble in Korea. He specifically pointed out that the division of Korea, the failure to arm the South sufficiently; the loss of mainland China to the Communists; and Secretary Acheson’s speech on 12 January 1950 had all made the attack inevitable.
Senator Taft also commented that, while he approved of the actions that President Truman had taken in Korea since the invasion, the President had gone about it in the wrong way and should have requested a Congressional resolution authorizing the intervention.
During the National Security Council meeting, that afternoon, the subject of Russian intervention and intentions were again discussed. The reaction and support of the other NATO countries were also discussed. Averell Harriman, who had just returned from Paris, reported a general feeling of relief when the US announced it would meet the challenge in Korea. He further stated that the Europeans were fully aware of the implications of the Presidents decision.
Harriman? Averell Harriman? That’s the name of big rats we know from WWI (his father), from WWII, from financing the Nazis, from making money on Jew Slave labor, from Skull & Bones – and from Committee of 300. So please listen to the alarm bells ringing!
The Secretary of Defense, GC Marshall, brought up a proposed directive to be sent to General MacArthur in which the last paragraph could give the impression that the US was planning to go to war with Russia. But the President very emphatically said he wanted no messages sent that had such implications in it. He wanted all actions to be taken to repulse the North Korean attack back to the 38th parallel, but the President stated that he "... wanted to be sure that we would not become so deeply committed in Korea that we could not take care of such other situations as might develop."
His military advisors requested that they be authorized to conduct air and naval operations north of the 38th parallel. The President agreed, pointing out that the attacks in North Korea should be restricted to military targets.
So Truman demanded that North Korea should stay behind the 38th parallel – and at the same time, authorized US air and naval operation north of the 38th parallel.
Quote Truman Memoirs
I wanted it clearly understood that our operations in Korea were designed to restore peace there and to restore the border.
Peace? For sure ... But I’m not sure that the US military crossing the line made that “clearly understood.”
As Special Assistant to the President, Averell Harriman traveled to Tokyo at once to discuss the Far Eastern political situation with General Mac Arthur. The President said, "I had asked Harriman to visit MacArthur so that the General might be given a firsthand account of the political planning in Washington.”
After Harriman came back from his discussion with MacArthur, he – according to Senator Dean Acheson reported:
Harriman returned with an ambivalent report. On the one hand, he told the President and me (Acheson) that MacArthur, while disagreeing with our China and Formosa policy, had said he was a good soldier and knew how to obey orders. Yet doubts persisted in Harriman’s mind that he and MacArthur had come "to a full agreement on the way we believed things should be handled on Formosa and with the Generalissimo.”
General MacArthur’s view of the visit, as published in his Reminiscences, was quite different. He had the impression that there was no fixed and comprehensive US policy – and that foreign influences, especially those of Great Britain, were very powerful in Washington.
That would be my guess too.
Quote from this article
Observers wondered which constitutional authority gave Truman the power to commit American soldiers to a long-term conflict. Initially, he was acting under his own powers as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, but even he seemed to struggle to justify the decision he had already made by sending American armed forces into a war zone without a congressional declaration of war. When describing military action, Truman first spoke of working with the United Nations “to suppress a bandit raid.” When a reporter asked whether it was fair to call the effort a “police action,” Truman replied, “Yes. That is exactly what it amounts to.” When meeting with congressional leaders in late June 1950, Truman described his role thusly: “I just had to act as Commander in Chief, and I did.”
Commander in Chief? I think it’s time for at little psychology.
Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance, in my words, is:
When the core beliefs are confronted with facts that show that those core beliefs are wrong, the stress level gets very high, and many people react with denial.
Sidenote about “denial”: It’s one of the early defense mechanisms. All defense mechanisms have to do with avoiding fear – which hormonally is the same as stress.
Example of denial: In December, I come into the kitchen and see my 2-year-old grandson eating the Christmas cookies. I tell them we are not allowed to eat the cookies before Christmas. The 2-year-old says: “I don’t do that,” – with the hand still in the cookie jar. That hand does not “exist.”
Repression is a later defense mechanism. If the child had been 7, he would have removed the hand from the cookie jar before claiming, “I’m not doing that.”
Just to say: If you see denial, you know, there is no way to communicate about the fact you show. You are facing a 2-year-old, so to speak.
We all have core beliefs – whether we are conscious about it or not.
This, previous, and future articles are about Tavistock’s mass brainwashing. I dare to postulate, that none of us is free of their propaganda. The difference between us and our fellow citizens is that we dare look at ourselves and our beliefs and question if we could be wrong? We dare look at evidence and facts that show that our beliefs were false. We don’t regress to being 2-years-olds.
Everyone gets stress arousal when confronted with facts going against our beliefs - so the most significant difference is how well we cope with stress. And as I’ve written about in Part 13, the Cabal has attacked our stress system for decades.
I posted the following Coleman quote in a chat a while ago: “The President is not Commander in Chief - unless there is a war!” I searched and found confirmation of this claim – which I also posted. The Commander in Chief Clause of Article II, Section 2 provides that “The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States when called into the actual Service of the United States.”
This article confirms that the President only becomes the Commander in Chief when “called” into Service of the United States. Please read it 🙏
Quote:
In the 20th century, America has been involved in 19 conflicts in which Congress has not declared war as the Constitution requires.
and:
The power to “call” up the armed forces is listed in Article 1, which lists almost all of the powers delegated to Congress.
“Declare war” is on that list.
What is your core belief about America? Can that belief stand when confronted with “America has been involved in 19 wars, illegally”?
I wonder how many read the article after those first lines – with an open mind? Let’s assume many people did.
I guess that another core belief was challenged, then.
A core belief, that “Trump is CIC,” “Trump is a wartime president.”
Sorry if I provoke some: That is a fruit bowl. That is apples and oranges.
The article is about “oranges,” – so it can’t be dismissed by “apples.”
But okay, let’s look at apples: I also believe that Trump is CIC and a wartime president. I don’t know for sure how he did it – it could be Devolution, could be Continuity of Government. It could be something else. I don’t know.
Facts are: The stolen election was an act of war. Congress didn’t have to declare war – the invasion was an act of war.
I don’t know what Trump has written in a PEAD or how he and his team have solved this.
I can see how he COULD have done it, though. He could have declared Martial Law Proper, which is a constitutional response to an invasion. Normally it is called by Congress, but “when the action of Congress cannot be invited […] by the President, in times of insurrection or invasion.”
Several members of Congress are part of the crime, so they “cannot be invited.”
That proves it can be done. How he did it, I don’t know.
But let’s get back to apples and oranges.
Let’s say the article is about “oranges.” Oranges: The President is only CIC when Congress has declared war – then he is called to action. That is in the Law.
If those oranges confront core beliefs about apples, ie.: Trump is CIC, therefore, a President is always CIC – well, some might dismiss those facts.
Do you see? Fruitbowl. And Cognitive Dissonance.
John Coleman says that Clinton called himself CIC, again and again - and thereby brainwashed people to think that the President is always CIC.
Coleman pointed to Clinton, but I’ve found that he was not the first to do that. Truman was.
That was 70 years ago, and since then, we have heard one President after another calling himself Commander-in-Chief. We have heard others naming the President that way. We have seen one TV show after another using that title.
But the clause hasn’t changed. This means, that almost all of us have bought the title without checking the facts.
And the interesting question is: Why were we programmed to believe that the President can go to war without Congress declaring war? And why were we programmed to believe that the President is always Commander in Chief?
Nuclear threat
I wonder, if you Americans have thought about why "North Korean nuclear threat" has come up again and again for decades?
Quote from a 2010 Newsmax article
From the 1950s Pentagon to today's Obama administration, the United States has repeatedly pondered, planned, and threatened the use of nuclear weapons against North Korea, according to declassified and other U.S. government documents released in this 60th-anniversary year of the Korean War.
Truman fired General MacArthur, and I’ve been looking into why? I can’t give you a conclusion because I find contradicting information. At one end of the scale is: He wanted to unite North and South Korea. On the other end of the scale is this interview published posthumously (in print, not him speaking.)
Quote - from this article
MacArthur said he had a plan that would have won the war in 10 days: "I would have dropped 30 or so atomic bombs . . . strung across the neck of Manchuria." Then he would have introduced half a million Chinese Nationalist troops at the Yalu and then "spread behind us -- from the Sea of Japan to the Yellow Sea -- a belt of radioactive cobalt . . . it has an active life of between 60 and 120 years. For at least 60 years there could have been no land invasion of Korea from the North."
Let me guess: I believe the sources that say, that MacArthur would have preferred to unite North and South Korea and that he believed the first words of President Truman - that he was sent on a peace mission. That might have been his attitude in the beginning of the war.
I suspect that the two Committee of 300 members, Averell and Dean Acheson muddled the communication between Truman and MacArthur. I have no doubt, that the “300” didn’t want peace.
As Mac Arthur said he “was a good soldier and knew how to obey orders.”
So maybe he did come up with the above-described plan to destroy the border with nuclear weapons because he thought that was the kind of plan that was expected of him?
Or maybe he was just crazy.
This video shows what war does to the psyche. I had a lump in my throat while watching it.
In 2010 North Korea's vice foreign minister, Pak Kil Yon, told the U.N. General Assembly in New York, that NK had learned a lesson. He used words such as "the increasing nuclear threat of the U.S.," – and cited this as the reason it developed its own atom-bomb program — as a deterrent.
Korean War documents were released by the CIA in 2010 at the 60-years anniversary of the start of the conflict. Another declassified package has been obtained by Washington's private National Security Archive research group under the Freedom of Information Act. Additional documents, also once top-secret were found at the U.S. National Archives and provided to The Associated Press by intelligence historian and author Matthew Aid.
And still, from 2010 to the present the propaganda goes on: “North Korea is a nuclear threat.”
To me, this is a clear example of how Predicted Programming works through media.
All the facts about America’s illegal wars and horrific weapons are on the internet. But still many people get all nervous about “NK is a nuclear threat.”
NK developed an Atom-Bomb Program as a deterrent.
Just as Putin recently presented a deterrent when he said: The West threatens to use nuclear weapons against us. We remind them, that we too have nuclear weapons – and we won’t hesitate to use them if we are attacked.
In MSM only the last part is told:
“Russia threatens to use nuclear weapons against the West.”
A lot of people get scared – which is Predictive Programming. We will look into this in the next Part before we continue to look at Presidents and The Cabal’s infiltration of Administrations.
Links
Book about Truman and MacArthur in electronic library
https://archive.org/details/trumanyears0000uebe/page/n15/mode/1up?view=theater&q=MacArthur
Truman / MacArthur Controversy
https://archive.org/details/DTIC_AD0748112/page/n19/mode/2up?view=theater
Guardian article about the Bush/Nazi/Thyssen connection
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar?all=true/
The Truman Doctrine
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/truman-doctrine
Bush and Hitler
http://archive.rhizome.org/artbase/1693/bushhitler.html
John Buchanan article about Bush/ Nazi
https://rense.com/general42/bshnazi.htm
American supporters of the European Fascists
http://www.rationalrevolution.net/war/american_supporters_of_the_europ.htm
Hiroshima bombing
https://www.icanw.org/hiroshima_and_nagasaki_bombings
Article about Hiroshima and Nagasaki with copyright photos
https://www.icanw.org/hiroshima_and_nagasaki_bombings
National Security Act
https://www.dni.gov/index.php/ic-legal-reference-book/national-security-act-of-1947
The Truman Doctrine
https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/truman-doctrine
Transcript of Truman’s speech to Congress here: https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/truman-doctrine
The Bill of Right Institute article - about Truman in Korea
https://billofrightsinstitute.org/essays/truman-intervenes-in-korea
About NK nuclear option
https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/north-korea-nuclear-option/2010/10/09/id/373150/
Commander in Chief article
https://americanfoundingprinciples.com/when-is-the-president-the-commander-in-chief/
Truman fired Mac Arthur
https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/9245
Prosecution under Trading with the enemy act – mere udførlig
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar?all=true/
Newsmax article about NK nuclear propaganda
https://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/north-korea-nuclear-option/2010/10/09/id/373150/
I love that you do so much research and provide resources each article. Planning a road trip at the end of the month and intend to re-read all your articles and take notes. Keep up the good work!
Great job Jytte! You are tying together all the strings of a giant spider web. So much death and destruction has been caused by these rats claiming they are doing this for the freedom of people.